<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!DOCTYPE PubmedArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMedArticle, 1st January 2025//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/out/pubmed_250101.dtd">
<PubmedArticleSet>
<PubmedArticle><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM" IndexingMethod="Manual"><PMID Version="1">28096893</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2017</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>07</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1748-6718</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>2016</Volume><PubDate><Year>2016</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Computational and mathematical methods in medicine</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Comput Math Methods Med</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Determining Cutoff Point of Ensemble Trees Based on Sample Size in Predicting Clinical Dose with DNA Microarray Data.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><StartPage>6794916</StartPage><MedlinePgn>6794916</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="pii" ValidYN="Y">6794916</ELocationID><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1155/2016/6794916</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText><i>Background/Aim</i>. Evaluating the success of dose prediction based on genetic or clinical data has substantially advanced recently. The aim of this study is to predict various clinical dose values from DNA gene expression datasets using data mining techniques. <i>Materials and Methods</i>. Eleven real gene expression datasets containing dose values were included. First, important genes for dose prediction were selected using iterative sure independence screening. Then, the performances of regression trees (RTs), support vector regression (SVR), RT bagging, SVR bagging, and RT boosting were examined. <i>Results</i>. The results demonstrated that a regression-based feature selection method substantially reduced the number of irrelevant genes from raw datasets. Overall, the best prediction performance in nine of 11 datasets was achieved using SVR; the second most accurate performance was provided using a gradient-boosting machine (GBM). <i>Conclusion</i>. Analysis of various dose values based on microarray gene expression data identified common genes found in our study and the referenced studies. According to our findings, SVR and GBM can be good predictors of dose-gene datasets. Another result of the study was to identify the sample size of <i>n</i> = 25 as a cutoff point for RT bagging to outperform a single RT.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Y&#x131;lmaz Is&#x131;khan</LastName><ForeName>Selen</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-3725-2987</Identifier><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Vocational School of Social Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey; Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Karabulut</LastName><ForeName>Erdem</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Alpar</LastName><ForeName>Celal Reha</ForeName><Initials>CR</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>20</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Comput Math Methods Med</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101277751</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1748-670X</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D004364">Pharmaceutical Preparations</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000465" MajorTopicYN="N">Algorithms</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D001185" MajorTopicYN="N">Artificial Intelligence</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003198" MajorTopicYN="N">Computer Simulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D057225" MajorTopicYN="N">Data Mining</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="N">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020869" MajorTopicYN="N">Gene Expression Profiling</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005786" MajorTopicYN="N">Gene Expression Regulation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D023281" MajorTopicYN="N">Genomics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015233" MajorTopicYN="N">Models, Statistical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D020411" MajorTopicYN="N">Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004364" MajorTopicYN="N">Pharmaceutical Preparations</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010597" MajorTopicYN="N">Pharmacogenetics</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011336" MajorTopicYN="N">Probability</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D051381" MajorTopicYN="N">Rats</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D012044" MajorTopicYN="N">Regression Analysis</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018401" MajorTopicYN="N">Sample Size</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D013045" MajorTopicYN="N">Species Specificity</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D060388" MajorTopicYN="N">Support Vector Machine</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015003" MajorTopicYN="N">Yeasts</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="N">metabolism</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><CoiStatement>The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.</CoiStatement></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2016</Year><Month>7</Month><Day>29</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>18</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>27</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2017</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>19</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2017</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>18</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2017</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>8</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pmc-release"><Year>2016</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>20</Day></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28096893</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC5206477</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1155/2016/6794916</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Segal M. R., Dahlquist K. D., Conklin B. R. Regression approaches for microarray data analysis. Journal of Computational Biology. 2003;10(6):961&#x2013;980. doi: 10.1089/106652703322756177.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1089/106652703322756177</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14980020</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Smola A., Vapnik V. N. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vol. 9. MIT Press; 1997. Support vector regression machines; pp. 155&#x2013;161.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Brown M. P. S., Grundy W. N., Lin D., et al. Knowledge-based analysis of microarray gene expression data by using support vector machines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97(1):262&#x2013;267. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.1.262.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1073/pnas.97.1.262</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC26651</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10618406</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ye N. The Handbook of Data Mining. 1st. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2003.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Boulesteix A.-L., Strobl C., Augustin T., Daumer M. Evaluating microarray-based classifiers: an overview. Cancer Informatics. 2008;6:77&#x2013;97.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2623308</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19259405</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Abrahantes J. C., Shkedy Z., Molenberghs G. Alternative methods to evaluate trial level surrogacy. Clinical Trials. 2008;5(3):194&#x2013;208. doi: 10.1177/1740774508091677.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1177/1740774508091677</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18559408</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cutler A., Cutler D. R., Stevens J. R. Tree-based methods. In: Li X., Xu R., editors. High-Dimensional Data Analysis in Cancer Research. 1st. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2009.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Cosgun E., Karaagaoglu E. Veri Madencili&#x11f;i Y&#xf6;ntemleriyle Mikrodizilim Gen &#x130;fade Analizi. Hacettepe T&#x131;p Dergisi. 2011;42:180&#x2013;189.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mart&#xed;nez-Mu&#xf1;oz G., Su&#xe1;rez A. Out-of-bag estimation of the optimal sample size in bagging. Pattern Recognition. 2010;43(1):143&#x2013;152. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2009.05.010.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.patcog.2009.05.010</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Klein T. E., Altman R. B., Eriksson N., et al. Estimation of the warfarin dose with clinical and pharmacogenetic data. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2009;360(8):753&#x2013;764. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa0809329.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1056/nejmoa0809329</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2722908</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19228618</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Quackenbush J. Microarray data normalization and transformation. Nature Genetics. 2002;32(5):496&#x2013;501. doi: 10.1038/ng1032.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1038/ng1032</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12454644</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Fang Y., Qin Y., Zhang N., Wang J., Wang H., Zheng X. DISIS: prediction of drug response through an iterative sure independence screening. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120408.e0120408</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0120408</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4368776</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25794193</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Fan J., Lv J. Sure independence screening for ultrahigh dimensional feature space. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Statistical Methodology. 2008;70(5):849&#x2013;911. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00674.x.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1111/j.1467-9868.2008.00674.x</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2709408</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19603084</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Vapnik V. N. An overview of statistical learning theory. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. 1999;10(5):988&#x2013;999. doi: 10.1109/72.788640.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1109/72.788640</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18252602</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Li G.-Z., Meng H.-H., Yang M. Q., Yang J. Y. Combining support vector regression with feature selection for multivariate calibration. Neural Computing and Applications. 2009;18(7):813&#x2013;820. doi: 10.1007/s00521-008-0202-6.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00521-008-0202-6</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Grubinger T., Kobel C., Pfeiffer K.-P. Regression tree construction by bootstrap: model search for DRG-systems applied to Austrian health-data. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2010;10(1, article 9) doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-9.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1186/1472-6947-10-9</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2828419</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20122286</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hastie T., Tibshirani R., Friedman J. The Elements of Statistical Learning. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2001. (Springer Series in Statistics).</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Yang P., Yang Y. H., Zhou B. B., Zomaya A. Y. A review of ensemble methods in bioinformatics. Current Bioinformatics. 2010;5(4):296&#x2013;308. doi: 10.2174/157489310794072508.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.2174/157489310794072508</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning. 1996;24(2):123&#x2013;140.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>B{\"u}hlmann P., Hothorn T. Boosting algorithms: regularization, prediction and model fitting. Statistical Science. 2007;22(4):477&#x2013;505. doi: 10.1214/07-sts242.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1214/07-sts242</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ridgeway G. The state of boosting. Computing Science and Statistics. 1999;31:172&#x2013;181.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Drucker H., Burges C. J. C., Kaufman L., Smola A., Vapnik V. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Vol. 9. MIT Press; 1997. Support vector regression machines; pp. 155&#x2013;161.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Breiman L. 547. Berkeley, Calif, USA: University of California-Department of Statistics; 1999. Using adaptive bagging to debias regressions.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ridgeway G. gbm: Generalized boosted regression models. R package version 1.6-3, 2007.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Friedman J. H. Stochastic gradient boosting. Computational Statistics &amp; Data Analysis. 2002;38(4):367&#x2013;378. doi: 10.1016/s0167-9473(01)00065-2.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/s0167-9473(01)00065-2</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Burton A., Altman D. G., Royston P., Holder R. L. The design of simulation studies in medical statistics. Statistics in Medicine. 2006;25(24):4279&#x2013;4292. doi: 10.1002/sim.2673.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1002/sim.2673</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16947139</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Jiang W., Simon R. A comparison of bootstrap methods and an adjusted bootstrap approach for estimating the prediction error in microarray classification. Statistics in Medicine. 2007;26(29):5320&#x2013;5334. doi: 10.1002/sim.2968.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1002/sim.2968</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17624926</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Refaeilzadeh P., Tang L., Liu H. Cross validation. In: Liu L., &#xd6;zsu M. T., editors. Encyclopedia of Database Systems (EDBS) 1st. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2009. pp. 532&#x2013;538.</Citation></Reference><Reference><Citation>Bensellam M., Van Lommel L., Overbergh L., Schuit F. C., Jonas J. C. Cluster analysis of rat pancreatic islet gene mRNA levels after culture in low-, intermediate- and high-glucose concentrations. Diabetologia. 2009;52(3):463&#x2013;476. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1245-z.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1007/s00125-008-1245-z</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19165461</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Van Dijk S. J., Feskens E. J. M., Bos M. B., et al. A saturated fatty acid-rich diet induces an obesity-linked proinflammatory gene expression profile in adipose tissue of subjects at risk of metabolic syndrome. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2009;90(6):1656&#x2013;1664. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27792.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.3945/ajcn.2009.27792</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19828712</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Song M. O., Li J., Freedman J. H. Physiological and toxicological transcriptome changes in HepG2 cells exposed to copper. Physiological Genomics. 2009;38(3):386&#x2013;401. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00083.2009.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1152/physiolgenomics.00083.2009</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3774564</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19549813</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Harrill J. A., Li Z., Wright F. A., et al. Transcriptional response of rat frontal cortex following acute in vivo exposure to the pyrethroid insecticides permethrin and deltamethrin. BMC Genomics. 2008;9, article no. 546 doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-546.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-9-546</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2626604</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19017407</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>McQuisten K. A., Peek A. S. Comparing artificial neural networks, general linear models and support vector machines in building predictive models for small interfering RNAs. PLOS ONE. 2009;4(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0007522.e7522</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0007522</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2760777</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19847297</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Braga P. L., Oliveira A. L. I., Ribeiro G. H. T., Meira S. R. L. Bagging predictors for estimation of software project effort. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN '07); August 2007; Orlando, Fla, USA. pp. 1595&#x2013;1600.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1109/ijcnn.2007.4371196</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></PubmedArticle></PubmedArticleSet>