<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!DOCTYPE PubmedArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMedArticle, 1st January 2025//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/out/pubmed_250101.dtd">
<PubmedArticleSet>
<PubmedArticle><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM" IndexingMethod="Manual"><PMID Version="1">28848051</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2017</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>19</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2021</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>04</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1083-351X</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>292</Volume><Issue>41</Issue><PubDate><Year>2017</Year><Month>Oct</Month><Day>13</Day></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Journal of biological chemistry</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Biol Chem</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>The transcription factor Gbx2 induces expression of Kruppel-like factor 4 to maintain and induce na&#xef;ve pluripotency of embryonic stem cells.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><StartPage>17121</StartPage><EndPage>17128</EndPage><MedlinePgn>17121-17128</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1074/jbc.M117.803254</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>The transcription factor Gbx2 (gastrulation brain homeobox 2) is a direct target of the LIF/STAT3 signaling pathway, maintains mouse embryonic stem cell (mESC) self-renewal, and facilitates mouse epiblast stem cell (mEpiSC) reprogramming to na&#xef;ve pluripotency. However, the mechanism by which Gbx2 mediates its effects on pluripotency remains unknown. Here, using an RNA-Seq approach, we identified Klf4 (Kruppel-like factor 4) as a direct target of Gbx2. Functional studies indicated that Klf4 mediates the self-renewal-promoting effects of Gbx2, because knockdown of <i>Klf4</i> expression abrogated the ability of Gbx2 to maintain the undifferentiated state of mESCs. We also found that Gbx2 largely depends on <i>Klf4</i> to reprogram mEpiSCs to a mESC-like state. In summary, our study has uncovered a mechanism by which Gbx2 maintains and induces na&#xef;ve pluripotency. These findings expand our understanding of the pluripotency control network and may inform the development of culture conditions for improved ESC maintenance and differentiation.</AbstractText><CopyrightInformation>&#xa9; 2017 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.</CopyrightInformation></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wang</LastName><ForeName>Manman</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>From the Center for Stem Cell and Translational Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China and.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Tang</LastName><ForeName>Ling</ForeName><Initials>L</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>From the Center for Stem Cell and Translational Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China and.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Liu</LastName><ForeName>Dahai</ForeName><Initials>D</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>From the Center for Stem Cell and Translational Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China and.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ying</LastName><ForeName>Qi-Long</ForeName><Initials>QL</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>the Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research at USC, Department of Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ye</LastName><ForeName>Shoudong</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>From the Center for Stem Cell and Translational Medicine, School of Life Sciences, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China and shdye@126.com.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2017</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>28</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Biol Chem</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>2985121R</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0021-9258</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C513182">Gbx2 protein, mouse</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D018398">Homeodomain Proteins</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="C000715468">Klf4 protein, mouse</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D000090062">Kruppel-Like Factor 4</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D051741">Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002460" MajorTopicYN="N">Cell Line</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D065150" MajorTopicYN="N">Cellular Reprogramming</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000502" MajorTopicYN="Y">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055785" MajorTopicYN="N">Gene Knockdown Techniques</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018398" MajorTopicYN="N">Homeodomain Proteins</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="Y">metabolism</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000090062" MajorTopicYN="N">Kruppel-Like Factor 4</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D051741" MajorTopicYN="N">Kruppel-Like Transcription Factors</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="Y">metabolism</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D051379" MajorTopicYN="N">Mice</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000066450" MajorTopicYN="N">Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000166" MajorTopicYN="N">cytology</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000378" MajorTopicYN="Y">metabolism</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList><KeywordList Owner="NOTNLM"><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Gbx2</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4)</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">cell biology</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">differentiation</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">embryonic stem cell</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">reprogramming</Keyword><Keyword MajorTopicYN="N">self-renewal</Keyword></KeywordList><CoiStatement>The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article</CoiStatement></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2017</Year><Month>6</Month><Day>20</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2017</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>28</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2017</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2017</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2017</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>30</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pmc-release"><Year>2018</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>13</Day></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28848051</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC5641878</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1074/jbc.M117.803254</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0021-9258(20)33944-2</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Evans M. J., and Kaufman M. H. (1981) Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154&#x2013;156</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">7242681</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Martin G. R. (1981) Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 7634&#x2013;7638</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC349323</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">6950406</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Smith A. G. (2001) Embryo-derived stem cells: of mice and men. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 17, 435&#x2013;462</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11687496</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ye S., Liu D., and Ying Q. L. (2014) Signaling pathways in induced naive pluripotency. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 28, 10&#x2013;15</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4262619</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25173148</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Smith A. G., and Hooper M. L. (1987) Buffalo rat liver cells produce a diffusible activity which inhibits the differentiation of murine embryonal carcinoma and embryonic stem cells. Dev. Biol. 121, 1&#x2013;9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3569655</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ohtsuka S., Nakai-Futatsugi Y., and Niwa H. (2015) LIF signal in mouse embryonic stem cells. Jak-Stat 4, e1086520.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4802755</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">27127728</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Williams R. L., Hilton D. J., Pease S., Willson T. A., Stewart C. L., Gearing D. P., Wagner E. F., Metcalf D., Nicola N. A., and Gough N. M. (1988) Myeloid leukaemia inhibitory factor maintains the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells. Nature 336, 684&#x2013;687</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3143916</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Smith A. G., Heath J. K., Donaldson D. D., Wong G. G., Moreau J., Stahl M., and Rogers D. (1988) Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides. Nature 336, 688&#x2013;690</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3143917</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hirai H., Karian P., and Kikyo N. (2011) Regulation of embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency by leukaemia inhibitory factor. Biochem. J. 438, 11&#x2013;23</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3418323</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21793804</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Burdon T., Chambers I., Stracey C., Niwa H., and Smith A. (1999) Signaling mechanisms regulating self-renewal and differentiation of pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Cells Tissues Organs 165, 131&#x2013;143</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10592385</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Huang G., Ye S., Zhou X., Liu D., and Ying Q. L. (2015) Molecular basis of embryonic stem cell self-renewal: from signaling pathways to pluripotency network. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 72, 1741&#x2013;1757</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4809369</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25595304</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Burdon T., Stracey C., Chambers I., Nichols J., and Smith A. (1999) Suppression of SHP-2 and ERK signalling promotes self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev. Biol. 210, 30&#x2013;43</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10364425</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Matsuda T., Nakamura T., Nakao K., Arai T., Katsuki M., Heike T., and Yokota T. (1999) STAT3 activation is sufficient to maintain an undifferentiated state of mouse embryonic stem cells. EMBO J. 18, 4261&#x2013;4269</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC1171502</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10428964</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Niwa H., Burdon T., Chambers I., and Smith A. (1998) Self-renewal of pluripotent embryonic stem cells is mediated via activation of STAT3. Genes Dev. 12, 2048&#x2013;2060</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC316954</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9649508</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Fukada T., Hibi M., Yamanaka Y., Takahashi-Tezuka M., Fujitani Y., Yamaguchi T., Nakajima K., and Hirano T. (1996) Two signals are necessary for cell proliferation induced by a cytokine receptor gp130: involvement of STAT3 in anti-apoptosis. Immunity 5, 449&#x2013;460</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8934572</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Levy D. E., and Darnell J. E. Jr. (2002) Stats: transcriptional control and biological impact. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 651&#x2013;662</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12209125</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Wang X., Crowe P. J., Goldstein D., and Yang J. L. (2012) STAT3 inhibition, a novel approach to enhancing targeted therapy in human cancers (review). Int. J. Oncol. 41, 1181&#x2013;1191</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22842992</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Sasse J., Hemmann U., Schwartz C., Schniertshauer U., Heesel B., Landgraf C., Schneider-Mergener J., Heinrich P. C., and Horn F. (1997) Mutational analysis of acute-phase response factor/Stat3 activation and dimerization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 4677&#x2013;4686</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC232320</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9234724</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Tai C. I., and Ying Q. L. (2013) Gbx2, a LIF/Stat3 target, promotes reprogramming to and retention of the pluripotent ground state. J. Cell Sci. 126, 1093&#x2013;1098</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23345404</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hall J., Guo G., Wray J., Eyres I., Nichols J., Grotewold L., Morfopoulou S., Humphreys P., Mansfield W., Walker R., Tomlinson S., and Smith A. (2009) Oct4 and LIF/Stat3 additively induce Kruppel factors to sustain embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Cell Stem Cell 5, 597&#x2013;609</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19951688</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Niwa H., Ogawa K., Shimosato D., and Adachi K. (2009) A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells. Nature 460, 118&#x2013;122</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19571885</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ye S., Zhang D., Cheng F., Wilson D., Mackay J., He K., Ban Q., Lv F., Huang S., Liu D., and Ying Q. L. (2016) Wnt/&#x3b2;-catenin and LIF-Stat3 signaling pathways converge on Sp5 to promote mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal. J. Cell Sci. 129, 269&#x2013;276</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4732286</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26598557</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Martello G., Bertone P., and Smith A. (2013) Identification of the missing pluripotency mediator downstream of leukaemia inhibitory factor. EMBO J. 32, 2561&#x2013;2574</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3791366</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23942233</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Ye S., Li P., Tong C., and Ying Q. L. (2013) Embryonic stem cell self-renewal pathways converge on the transcription factor Tfcp2l1. EMBO J. 32, 2548&#x2013;2560</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3791365</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23942238</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Guo G., Yang J., Nichols J., Hall J. S., Eyres I., Mansfield W., and Smith A. (2009) Klf4 reverts developmentally programmed restriction of ground state pluripotency. Development 136, 1063&#x2013;1069</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2685927</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19224983</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Festuccia N., Osorno R., Halbritter F., Karwacki-Neisius V., Navarro P., Colby D., Wong F., Yates A., Tomlinson S. R., and Chambers I. (2012) Esrrb is a direct Nanog target gene that can substitute for Nanog function in pluripotent cells. Cell Stem Cell 11, 477&#x2013;490</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3473361</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23040477</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Chambers I., Colby D., Robertson M., Nichols J., Lee S., Tweedie S., and Smith A. (2003) Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell 113, 643&#x2013;655</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">12787505</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Jiang J., Chan Y. S., Loh Y. H., Cai J., Tong G. Q., Lim C. A., Robson P., Zhong S., and Ng H. H. (2008) A core Klf circuitry regulates self-renewal of embryonic stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 353&#x2013;360</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18264089</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Russell R., Ilg M., Lin Q., Wu G., Lechel A., Bergmann W., Eiseler T., Linta L., Kumar P. P., Klingenstein M., Adachi K., Hohwieler M., Sakk O., Raab S., Moon A., et al. (2015) A dynamic role of TBX3 in the pluripotency circuitry. Stem Cell Reports 5, 1155&#x2013;1170</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4682344</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">26651606</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Takahashi K., and Yamanaka S. (2006) Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663&#x2013;676</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16904174</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Wei Z., Yang Y., Zhang P., Andrianakos R., Hasegawa K., Lyu J., Chen X., Bai G., Liu C., Pera M., and Lu W. (2009) Klf4 interacts directly with Oct4 and Sox2 to promote reprogramming. Stem Cells 27, 2969&#x2013;2978</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19816951</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Roeseler D. A., Sachdev S., Buckley D. M., Joshi T., Wu D. K., Xu D., Hannink M., and Waters S. T. (2012) Elongation factor 1 &#x3b1;1 and genes associated with Usher syndromes are downstream targets of GBX2. PLoS One 7, e47366.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3493575</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23144817</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>
Chapman G., Remiszewski J. L., Webb G. C., Schulz T. C., Bottema C. D., and Rathjen P. D. (1997) The mouse homeobox gene, Gbx2: genomic organization and expression in pluripotent cells in vitro and <i>in vivo</i>. Genomics
46, 223&#x2013;233</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9417909</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Zhang P., Andrianakos R., Yang Y., Liu C., and Lu W. (2010) Kruppel-like factor 4 (Klf4) prevents embryonic stem (ES) cell differentiation by regulating Nanog gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 9180&#x2013;9189</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2838337</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20071344</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Pan G., and Thomson J. A. (2007) Nanog and transcriptional networks in embryonic stem cell pluripotency. Cell Res. 17, 42&#x2013;49</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17211451</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Brons I. G., Smithers L. E., Trotter M. W., Rugg-Gunn P., Sun B., Chuva de Sousa Lopes S. M., Howlett S. K., Clarkson A., Ahrlund-Richter L., Pedersen R. A., and Vallier L. (2007) Derivation of pluripotent epiblast stem cells from mammalian embryos. Nature 448, 191&#x2013;195</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17597762</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Tesar P. J., Chenoweth J. G., Brook F. A., Davies T. J., Evans E. P., Mack D. L., Gardner R. L., and McKay R. D. (2007) New cell lines from mouse epiblast share defining features with human embryonic stem cells. Nature 448, 196&#x2013;199</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17597760</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nichols J., and Smith A. (2009) Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 4, 487&#x2013;492</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19497275</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Wang Z., Oron E., Nelson B., Razis S., and Ivanova N. (2012) Distinct lineage specification roles for NANOG, OCT4, and SOX2 in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 10, 440&#x2013;454</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22482508</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Dah&#xe9;ron L., Opitz S. L., Zaehres H., Lensch M. W., Andrews P. W., Itskovitz-Eldor J., and Daley G. Q. (2004) LIF/STAT3 signaling fails to maintain self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 22, 770&#x2013;778</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15342941</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Chen H., Aksoy I., Gonnot F., Osteil P., Aubry M., Hamela C., Rognard C., Hochard A., Voisin S., Fontaine E., Mure M., Afanassieff M., Cleroux E., Guibert S., Chen J., et al. (2015) Reinforcement of STAT3 activity reprogrammes human embryonic stem cells to naive-like pluripotency. Nat. Commun. 6, 7095.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4479042</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25968054</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Hanna J., Cheng A. W., Saha K., Kim J., Lengner C. J., Soldner F., Cassady J. P., Muffat J., Carey B. W., and Jaenisch R. (2010) Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 9222&#x2013;9227</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC2889088</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20442331</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Kim H., Wu J., Ye S., Tai C. I., Zhou X., Yan H., Li P., Pera M., and Ying Q. L. (2013) Modulation of &#x3b2;-catenin function maintains mouse epiblast stem cell and human embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nat. Commun. 4, 2403.</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC4183150</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">23985566</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></PubmedArticle></PubmedArticleSet>