Property talk:P637

Documentation

• Start a query
• Current uses
• Statistics by class
• String length
• List of qualifiers
• Count

RefSeq protein ID
identifier for a protein

Description	Specifies the Protein ID. Use qualifier RefSeq (P656) to indicate Protein or RNA.
Applicable "stated in" value	RefSeq (Q7307074)
Data type	External identifier
Template parameter	en:Template:GNF_Protein_box = Hs_RefseqProtein
Domain	According to this template: gene (Q7187) According to statements in the property: protein (Q8054) or peptide (Q172847) When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Allowed values	[NYXW]P_(\d{6}|\d{9})(\.\d{1,2})?
Example	reelin (Q13561329) → NP_005036 (RDF) Chromogranin B (Q63398) → NP_001810 (RDF)
Format and edit filter validation	Characters + underscore + Digits
Source	http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Formatter URL	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/protein/$1
Lists	Items with the most statements of this property Count of items by number of statements (chart) Items with the most statements Items with the fewest statements Count of items by number of sitelinks (chart) Items with the most sitelinks Items with the most sitelinks, but no link to one Wikipedia (sample: Welsh Wikipedia, cywiki) Items with the fewest sitelinks Most linked wikis Items with the most identifier properties Items with no other external identifier Items with no other statements Most recently created items Items with novalue claims Items with unknown value claims Usage history (total) Usage history (main statement) Database reports/Constraint violations/P637 Map Random list
Proposal discussion	Proposal discussion
Current uses	Total 772,427 Main statement 771,549 out of 234,520,053 (0% complete) 99.9% of uses Qualifier 2 <0.1% of uses Reference 876 0.1% of uses
Search for values

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]

Format “[NYXW]P_(\d{6}|\d{9})(\.\d{1,2})?”: value must be formatted using this pattern (PCRE syntax). (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P637#Format, SPARQL

Type “protein (Q8054), peptide (Q172847)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “protein (Q8054), peptide (Q172847)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)

List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P637#Type Q8054, Q172847, hourly updated report, SPARQL

Allowed entity types are Wikibase item (Q29934200): the property may only be used on a certain entity type (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P637#Entity types

Scope is as main value (Q54828448), as reference (Q54828450): the property must be used by specified way only (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P637#Scope, SPARQL

This property is being used by: ca:Plantilla:Proteïna, ca:Plantilla:Infotaula proteïna Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

AMR format

Besides the many ID's with the format [NYX]P_(\d{6}|\d{9})(\.\d{1,2})? there are also some ID's in the form AMR\d+. Are these also okay and should we change the format constraint? --Pasleim (talk) 08:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Remove Distinct Value Constraint

Due to NCBI's Prokaryotic RefSeq reannotation project, many prokaryotic ref seq protein ID's are no longer unique. This new type of identifier, the non redundant ref seq ID, begins with the WP prefix and indicates the protein is shared among many strains. To remove redundancy, NCBI now combines identical prokaryotic proteins into a single ID, and unfortunately will invalidate the distinct value constraint of this property. For instance, Chlamydia muridarum Str. Nigg uses the new non redundant ref seq ID format, and its genes are annotated with non redundant ref seq IDs that are assigned to all strains of Chlamydia muridarum. (See pmp). In particular, you can see in the comment section: "This record represents a single, non-redundant, protein sequence which may be annotated on many different RefSeq genomes from the same, or different, species." Although it will no longer be possible to query a distinct protein using this property, the same behavior can be retained by combining the query with the tax ID of the organism. I believe that we should stay consistent with NCBI and remove the distinct value constraint from this property so we can continue to properly annotate new genes with non redundant ref seq IDs in WikiData. Djow2019 (talk) 21:28, 7 August 2018 (UTC)