Property talk:P682

Documentation

• Start a query
• Current uses
• Statistics by class
• List of values
• List of qualifiers
• Count

biological process
is involved in the biological process

Description	Used to represent gene ontology process annotations
Represents	biological process (Q2996394)
Data type	Item
Template parameter	en:Template:GNF_Protein_box = Function
Domain	According to this template: term According to statements in the property: protein (Q8054), polysaccharide (Q134219), protein complex (Q420927), gene (Q7187), group or class of proteins (Q84467700), protein-containing complex (Q22325163) or cell type (Q189118) When possible, data should only be stored as statements
Example	Neurotrophin 3 (Q24190) → positive regulation of MAP kinase activity (Q14864686) lactase (Q379764) → polysaccharide digestion (Q21118730)
Source	http://amigo.geneontology.org
Lists	Items with the most statements of this property Count of items by number of statements (chart) Items with the most statements Items with the fewest statements Count of items by number of sitelinks (chart) Items with the most sitelinks Items with the most sitelinks, but no link to one Wikipedia (sample: Welsh Wikipedia, cywiki) Items with the fewest sitelinks Most linked wikis Items with the most identifier properties By value of property Most statements Fewest statements Most sitelinks Most linked wikis Total of sitelinks on items Most identifiers Fewest identifiers Items with no other statements Most recently created items Items with novalue claims Items with unknown value claims Usage history (total) Usage history (main statement) Database reports/Constraint violations/P682 Map Random list
Proposal discussion	Proposal discussion
Current uses	Total 1,189,261 Main statement 1,189,258 >99.9% of uses Qualifier 3 <0.1% of uses
Search for values

[create Create a translatable help page (preferably in English) for this property to be included here]

Type “protein (Q8054), polysaccharide (Q134219), protein complex (Q420927), gene (Q7187), group or class of proteins (Q84467700), protein-containing complex (Q22325163), cell type (Q189118)”: item must contain property “instance of (P31), subclass of (P279)” with classes “protein (Q8054), polysaccharide (Q134219), protein complex (Q420927), gene (Q7187), group or class of proteins (Q84467700), protein-containing complex (Q22325163), cell type (Q189118)” or their subclasses (defined using subclass of (P279)). (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P682#Type Q8054, Q134219, Q420927, Q7187, Q84467700, Q22325163, Q189118, SPARQL

Property “Gene Ontology ID (P686)” declared by target items of “biological process (P682)”: If [item A] has this property with value [item B], [item B] is required to have property “Gene Ontology ID (P686)”. (Help)

Exceptions are possible as rare values may exist. Exceptions can be specified using exception to constraint (P2303).
List of violations of this constraint: Database reports/Constraint violations/P682#Target required claim P686, SPARQL, SPARQL (by value)

This property is being used by: eu:Txantiloi:Gene infotaula automatikoa Please notify projects that use this property before big changes (renaming, deletion, merge with another property, etc.)

Mapping to RO

I believe the intent is that this intended to be used where the GO Consortium would use involved in. Note that the GOC is refining the set of relationships that can connect a gene product to a term (to track, follow this: https://github.com/orgs/geneontology/projects/13). Crucially, it will distinguish when a gene product is truly involved in a process such as apoptosis vs when it is acting upstream of it. This will allow extraction of more precise gene sets. I can act as coordinator for Wikidata here. I suggest WD adopts the distinction too. I'm not sure whether this property should be mapped to the super-property or the more precise and useful involved-in. As an aside, I find the use of a noun phrase "biological process" for a property a bit odd.

For now I am wondering how best to map the current property to RO. I am thinking of making an RO ID property to RO:0002331 plus an equivalent property http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/RO_0002331. Note that these are not strictly equivalent since the RO relation is more general and can apply, for example, to a traffic light that is involved-in the regulation of traffic. I have a related question here: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property_talk:P1628#Semantics_-_when_should_this_be_used? Cmungall (talk) 19:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

@Cmungall: Hi Chris, unfortunately the project link you give is a 404 (now) so the general question: what is the status of the project? --SCIdude (talk) 16:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)